In her speech,
Condoleezza used nearly all of the political language strategies including
reinforcement, identification, polarization, defining, labeling, creating
drama, and persuasion. Reinforcement is obviously was a very influential
strategy for Condoleezza to use during this speech, she was speaking to a large
group of Republicans making reinforcement one of the easiest strategies for her
to use. The group she was speaking to agree with her ideologically, if not exactly
more so than they did with the Democratic candidate, so nearly everything she said
reinforced their beliefs and values while also getting the audience excited.
I believe that a lot
of the strategies were used intertwined for example Condoleezza used defining
to define family values as a Republican value, everyone to an extent has family
values so all of the people in the audience probably thought, “well I think
family is important” thus reinforcing their affiliation to the Republican
party.
Condoleezza used
identification heavily throughout her speech; she
repeatedly said the words “our Party” which automatically gives of the idea
that she and the audience are one in the same that they are on the same side. Rice
also told a story at the end of the speech about her grandfather, Granddaddy
Rice, and how he came from nothing and made something of himself; she said that
was not only her grandfather’s story but also the American story. By saying
that his story is the American story she is making it possible for the audience
to put themselves in that story and relate to what she is saying.
Polarization was used but only once and briefly, I
believe that was because she knew that the audience was on her side and she was
not needed to persuade them to switch affiliations. She used polarization by
telling the story of how her father decided to become a Republican, “He joined
our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register
him to vote. The Republicans did. My father has never forgotten that day, and
neither have I.”
Rice creates drama by talking
about the possibility of war, and blackmail that could happen if an outlaw
state got access to long-range ballistic missiles.
Rice uses labeling to say that protecting our country,
and using our military is a good thing, that being victorious is a good thing,
and that letting other countries blackmail and threaten us is a bad thing. Lastly
as in every political communication there is the use of persuasion. Rice talks
up President George W. Bush and makes him seem like an amazing man and candidate.
I feel that Rice was successful in her functions of the political language;
mainly because her main objective was completed George W. Bush won the
election.
The main strategy
that I do not think was used was inoculation and that is because it was not
necessary. When the people you are talking to agree with you, there is no need
to defend your position. When Rice gave this speech George W. Bush was the
Republican candidate for the presidential election, and the people who attend
the Republican National Convention are Republican’s so they were already on his
side.
I encourage you all to read this speech; knowing all that
has happened with the war in the Middle East it was interesting and kind of
eerie to read.
You found a really moving piece of political language to use, good job! The fact that you found a piece that uses almost every single use of political language is really intriguing. Do you think she could have been equally moving to an audience that had more democratic members?
ReplyDeleteI think that she could have been moving to an audience with some democratic members, if the members were more conservative. I don't think it would be as moving to a group of democrats though, because in today's day and age the parties are just too opposing to really be able to influence the other party positively.
ReplyDeleteDo you think her polarization with Jim Crow laws is effective? I think that is an interesting tactic to use, but potentially effective with the right crowd.
ReplyDeleteThat is a tough question, I could see it going either way honestly. Like you said, it is a potentially effective tactic to use as long as you have the right audience.
DeleteI'm always interested in what you choose to write about week to week since we are both writing about Rice. I also found that she used almost every use of political language in the speech I chose to write about. I've only ever payed attention to these two speeches of hers. It would be interesting to find out if she often makes such broad spectrum speeches or if there are instances of very effective speeches where she only uses one or two of the uses.
ReplyDeleteThat would be very interesting to find out. In my opinion, the more strategies you use the more effective the speech is.
DeleteI agree that she used all the appropriate political language and it was a well put together speech. I am also curious about how successful of a speech it would of been with a democratic audience, and seeing the changes that would of been made to the speech to make it a success.
ReplyDeleteThere would have to be some changes made to make it a success with a Democratic audience, but I do think that it would be possible.
DeleteWhy did you choose to write a speech from so long ago? Has she not done any good political communication since 2000
ReplyDeleteI'll be honest I googled Condoleezza Rice speeches and this was at the top of the page so I went with it. Not the best strategy, but it's what I did.
Delete