My
candidate has never run for a political office so finding political
advertisements for her campaign was impossible. However, I was able to find
advertisements with her in it endorsing different candidates.
Condoleezza
starred in Dan Sullivan’s advertisement during the 2014 Alaskan Senate
election. Dan Sullivan used Condoleezza to give him credibility. Condoleezza provides
credibility to his national security ability and high lights his military
service. As the former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s opinion of a
candidate carries a lot of weight. This ad is definitely candidate-positive. I
think that it is both an image and issue ad. The ad is building up the candidate’s image as
well as addressing issues of national security. She mentions how national
security is a major issue in our nation and how Dan Sullivan would fight to
keep our country safe. The fact that Dan Sullivan is a marine and has fought to
protect our nation already adds to his national security credibility. I think
that using Condoleezza was not only because she is an influential person, but
also because she is an influential woman. Having an influential woman
supporting a male candidate is likely able to persuade women voters.
The Dan Sullivan ad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MPj4F4dmI8
In 2010
Condoleezza Rice supported California Governor candidate Meg Whitman. Unlike
the more recent ad for Dan Sullivan, Condoleezza Rice was not the star of this
advertisement; Mitt Romney and Jon Coupal accompanied her. Like the Dan
Sullivan advertisement this is also a candidate-positive ad. This advertisement
is also both an image and an issue ad. They are working to portray Meg Whitman
in a positive light saying that she is a strong leader. They also touch on
issues such as the financial crisis in California, and proposition 13. In 2010
there was a budget crisis going on in California, so finances and property
taxes (proposition 13) were issues that were important to California voters.
Condoleezza talked the least out of the three Meg Whitman supporters in the ad,
which I think is because the other two supporters are more credible when it
comes to budget and tax issues. Mitt Romney knows what it takes to be a
Governor so his support of a candidate for Governor might hold more weight than
Condoleezza’s support. Jon Coupal is the President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers
Association so he is going to be more knowledgeable about budgets and taxes than
Rice is, and his opinion on those issues is going to mean more to voters. Although Mitt Romney and Jon Coupal are more
experienced in the issues they are addressing, Condoleezza Rice is in this
advertisement for a reason. I believe they picked her for this advertisement to
show that women can also be powerful leaders. When they are all saying
adjectives that describe Meg Whitman, Condoleezza says she is strong. I think
they were trying to create some connection between Rice and Whitman, saying
look women can be strong and influential too.
The Meg Whitman ad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBbQB0YMNZo
No comments:
Post a Comment